FTC Rule Banning Noncompetes: Impact on Florida’s Statute 542.335

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently made a groundbreaking move by announcing a rule banning non-compete agreements in certain employment contracts. This ruling has sparked widespread discussion and speculation about its implications, particularly in states with robust non-compete enforcement like Florida. In this post, we dive into the specifics of the FTC rule, its potential impact on existing non-compete agreements in Florida, and its relationship with Florida Statute 542.335.

Understanding the FTC Rule Banning Non-Competes

The FTC’s rule, aimed at enhancing competition in the labor market, prohibits employers from entering into, enforcing, or threatening to enforce non-compete agreements against employees. This rule is particularly significant because non-compete agreements have historically been used by employers to restrict employees from working for competitors or starting their own competing businesses for a certain period after leaving their current job.

The rationale behind the FTC’s decision is rooted in concerns that non-compete agreements stifle innovation, limit job mobility, and suppress wages. By restricting an employee’s ability to seek new opportunities or start a business in their field, these agreements can hinder economic growth and limit competition.

Impact on Existing Non-Competes in Florida

Florida is one of the states known for enforcing non-compete agreements relatively strictly, provided they meet certain criteria outlined in Florida Statute 542.335. This statute sets forth the requirements that non-compete agreements must satisfy to be enforceable in Florida, such as protecting a legitimate business interest, being reasonable in terms of duration and geographic scope, and not being overly burdensome on the employee.

With the FTC’s new rule banning non-competes, the landscape for existing non-compete agreements in Florida is likely to undergo significant changes. Employers with non-compete agreements currently in effect may find themselves unable to enforce these agreements against their employees due to the federal ban.

Employees, on the other hand, may now have greater freedom to seek new job opportunities, switch employers, or even start their own businesses without fear of facing legal repercussions from their former employers.

Impact on Florida Statute 542.335

Florida Statute 542.335 has been a cornerstone of non-compete enforcement in the state, providing a framework for determining the enforceability of non-compete agreements. However, the FTC’s rule banning non-competes raises questions about the statute’s continued relevance and applicability.

One possible scenario is that Florida may need to revise or amend its non-compete statute to align with the FTC’s new rule. This could involve narrowing the scope of permissible non-compete agreements or imposing additional restrictions on their enforceability to comply with federal guidelines.

Alternatively, Florida may choose to challenge the FTC’s rule on the grounds that it infringes upon the state’s rights to regulate employment contracts within its jurisdiction. Such a challenge could lead to legal battles and uncertainty regarding the enforceability of non-compete agreements in Florida until a resolution is reached.

Legal Challenge by the Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber of Commerce’s lawsuit challenges the FTC’s authority to issue a rule banning non-compete agreements, arguing that the FTC has overstepped its statutory authority and encroached upon the states’ traditional role in regulating employment contracts. The Chamber of Commerce contends that the FTC’s rule undermines the ability of employers and employees to freely negotiate and enter into non-compete agreements that are mutually beneficial.

Potential Impact on the FTC’s Rule

The outcome of the Chamber of Commerce’s lawsuit could have several potential impacts on the FTC’s rule banning non-competes:

Suspension or Reversal of the Rule: If the court rules in favor of the Chamber of Commerce, the FTC’s rule could be suspended or overturned, reinstating the legality of non-compete agreements at the federal level. This would effectively nullify the FTC’s efforts to ban non-competes and return the regulatory landscape to its previous state.

Narrowing the Scope of the Rule: Alternatively, the court could uphold the FTC’s authority to regulate non-compete agreements but impose limitations or modifications to the rule to address the Chamber of Commerce’s concerns. This could result in a revised rule that is less sweeping in its prohibition of non-competes or that provides clearer guidelines for when and how non-competes can be enforced.

Affirmation of the Rule: If the court upholds the FTC’s rule without significant modifications, it would validate the FTC’s authority to ban non-compete agreements and reinforce the federal government’s stance on promoting competition in the labor market by restricting the use of non-competes.

Implications for Employers and Employees

The outcome of the Chamber of Commerce’s lawsuit will undoubtedly have implications for employers and employees:

  • Employers: If the FTC’s rule is suspended or overturned, employers may regain the ability to enforce non-compete agreements against their employees, subject to state-specific laws and regulations. This could impact hiring practices, employee mobility, and competition within industries.
  • Employees: Conversely, if the FTC’s rule is upheld or modified to restrict the use of non-competes, employees may continue to enjoy greater freedom to change jobs, pursue new opportunities, and start their own businesses without the fear of facing legal repercussions from non-compete agreements.

Non-Compete Agreements Ban Shift Landscape of Emploment Contracts

The FTC’s rule banning non-compete agreements marks a significant shift in the landscape of employment contracts and labor market competition. While the full extent of its impact on existing non-competes in Florida and Florida Statute 542.335 remains to be seen, one thing is clear: employers and employees alike will need to adapt to this new regulatory environment.

Employers with existing non-compete agreements should consult with a non-compete attorney to assess their enforceability in light of the FTC’s rule, while employees should be aware of their newfound freedoms and rights in the workplace. As the legal and regulatory landscape continues to evolve, staying informed and proactive will be key to navigating the complexities of non-compete agreements in Florida and beyond.



    Jean ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

    "With so many attorneys advertising on TV, it is so hard to select one….I was fortunate enough to select the Shiner Law Group……why….because David Shiner and his staff are loyal, reliable and what is is so important to me is that they are reputable….they will always call you back….even if its just to say we are here for you!!!"

    Schedule A Free Consultation

    Speak With A Lawyer Now 100% Free Consultation

    We Are Always Available

    Contact Us 24 Hours A Day / 7 Days A Week

    ✉ YourLawyer@ShinerLawGroup.com

    Boca Raton


    FAX: 561-368-3364

    951 Yamato Rd. STE 210
    Boca Raton, FL 33431

    Directions: Click Here

    Shiner Law Group Boca Raton Personal Injury Lawyers

    West Palm Beach Office


    FAX: 561-368-3364

    120 S Dixie Hwy STE 203
    West Palm Beach, FL 33401

    Directions: Click Here

    Shiner Law Group West Palm Beach Personal Injury Lawyers



    FAX: 561-368-3364

    759 SW Federal Hwy STE 204C
    Stuart, FL 34994

    Directions: Click Here

    Stuart Personal Injury Attorney

    Fort Pierce


    FAX: 561-368-3364

    130 S Indian River Dr. STE 202
    Fort Pierce, FL 34950

    Directions: Click Here

    Shiner Law Group Fort Pierce Injury Lawyers

    youtube youtube instagram linkedin